Sikh leader's advice to MPs dismissed
Faith officially impartial to gay unions, Vedanti has `no understanding' of issue
The Toronto Star - Mar. 29, 2005 - A top Sikh leader in India who admonished Sikh Canadian MPs to not support same-sex marriage legislation has no authority to do so and, moreover, shows a remarkable lack of understanding of the issue, say some observers here.
Giani Joginder Singh Vedanti — acting as the Jathedar Akal Takht, the highest Sikh authority in Amritsar — told the Toronto Star's Martin Regg Cohn this week that he warned six Sikh Canadian MPs visiting India that they would be ostracized from the community if they supported Bill C-38.
"With the utmost respect, Mr. Vedanti and the Akhal Takht have no understanding of the Canadian context on this issue and have no jurisdiction to tell Canadians how to deal with it," T. Sher Singh, a Guelph lawyer and trustee of the Sikh Foundation International, said.
"He's no more a priest or high priest than I am the Queen of England," Singh added. He noted that Sikhdom does not have a religious hierarchy.
The Akhal Takht, whose office is across from the Golden Temple, has no authority on spiritual issues, but rather, rules on administrative and political matters facing the Sikh community in India, said Singh.
Same-sex union is not an issue the Sikh religion has an official stance on, so it's up to individual MPs to follow their own conscience, Singh said.
‘Show your faces,’ MP Holland tells bigot group
Ottawa - March 22, 2005 - An anonymous group circulating flyers across Canada attacking MPs who support same-sex marriage should come out of hiding and show their faces, Ajax-Pickering MP Mark Holland demands. à
The group, Concerned Canadian Parents, operates from a post office box in a 7-Eleven store on Weston Road in Toronto, and provides no information about who is behind its expensive campaign.
“Who is behind this group, and what are they hiding?” asks Holland. “Where is their money coming from? Is foreign money involved? Is a political party involved? We don’t know.”
The group has run expensive newspaper ads in major newspapers, but a search of editorial content of daily newspapers over the last three months found no news stories about the group.
“I call upon the media, who have been accepting their advertising dollars, to tell Canadians who is behind Concerned Canadian Parents,” said Holland.
The flyer alleges that “anti-marriage legislation” (Bill C-38 to allow same-sex marriage) is not about minority rights, but is “the thin edge of a wedge that will destroy our Canadian way of life and damage our families.” It is headed “Urgent! A message to all Ajax-Pickering families” and it mentions Holland by name as a supporter of the bill.
Similar leaflets have appeared in other Liberal ridings across Canada.
“I strongly disagree with this group’s message of intolerance, but I respect their right to free speech,” Holland says. “What I object to is that a cowardly, anonymous group can launch an expensive campaign to attack Parliamentarians without showing their faces.”
Tories tangled up in Marriage Act
Promised bill against same-sex unions has yet to be seen
The Edmonton Journal - It's been a week since Premier Ralph Klein bowed to pressure from social conservatives and announced that his government would, in fact, renew the notwithstanding clause in an attempt to protect the traditional definition of marriage in Alberta.
Use of the clause is so extraordinary a power, its invocation lasts only five years, so civil rights aren't suspended indefinitely without review.
Of course, renewing the clause would be a mean, empty gesture. As the Supreme Court unanimously confirmed in December, the definition of marriage in Canada is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.
This has nothing to do with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It goes all the way back to the BNA Act of 1867, when the provinces and the federal government divvied up their political powers.
Whether the Marriage Act contains the notwithstanding clause or not, it is still unconstitutional, because it trespasses on federal turf.
Alberta can invoke the notwithstanding clause all it likes. It might as well invoke the notwithstanding clause against snow in March or mosquitoes in July. Appeal courts across Canada have already acknowledged a right to same-sex marriage under the charter and the federal government has introduced legislation to recognize that fact.
UPCOMING EVENTS :: ÉVÉNEMENTS À VENIR
The Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto is organizing a
petition of religious leaders across Canada who support Bill C-38. The petition will be presented to Parliament prior to the second reading.
The petition reads…
We support Bill C-38, the Civil Marriage Act, which brings Canada's civil marriage law into conformity with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
- We support Bill C-38, the Civil Marriage Act, which brings Canada's civil marriage law into conformity with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
- Some of us have religious beliefs that support marriage for same-sex couples. Others of us do not. However, we all support the right of same-sex couples to marry in a civil ceremony.
- We support Freedom of Religion for those institutions who do not want to perform same-sex marriages, while also supporting Freedom of Religion for those institutions that do.
For more information, visit www.mcctoronto.com.